4/4/2007 | 2 MINUTE READ

The Credibility Of Continuity At Mini

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Although some designers seem to thrive on changing designs, MINI’s Gert Hildebrand thinks that consistency and continuity are laudable.

Share

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Gert Hildebrand, chief designer for MINI, is somewhat taken aback when asked to talk about the design of the new MINI, the second generation of the product since becoming a part of the BMW Group. “You shouldn’t talk about design,” he insists. You should look at it. Design should be self-explanatory.”

And while arguably the new MINI is somewhat self-explanatory—that is, it hews very closely to its predecessor, particular on the exterior—Hildebrand’s approach to design is worth understanding.

Hildebrand said that they started working on the vehicle back in 2001-2002, when the first vehicle was still new. “An early decision we made was that we didn’t want to change it dramatically, that we wanted to have an evolutionary design process.” He cites the examples of vehicles like the Porsche 911 and the VW Golf, cars that have advanced through gradual though perceptible changes, or what Hildebrand describes as “steps big enough to create desire, but safe enough to have recognizability for the customers.”

In fact, the perceptions of customers are crucial to Hildebrand’s approach to design. Speaking of when changes are proposed during a development program, he says, “When we go through the design process with my team, I question them until they convince me they’ve done something for a reason, not just because ‘I like it.’ ‘I like it’ is not enough. The customer has to like it. My designers don’t have to like it.”

He suggests that one of the problems that some vehicle manufacturers have is that they are too frequently changing their designs. “I was born in ’53, and I saw cars from Volkswagen, Porsche and Mercedes having a constant design development, and I saw the Fords and the Opels and the French cars changing every year. Who survives the best?” Hildebrand suggests that the vehicle manufacturers that make regular and massive changes to their products actually risk losing customers because the customer feels that what is a “new” car to him is suddenly old because there is a completely different version.

Hildebrand says that there is a distinct difference between “styling,” which he interprets as being more along the lines of art as in Art pour l’amour d’art, and design, which relates more to more of a functional, technical point of view, one wherein there are defined boundaries. “It is very easy for me or any other designer to work on a white piece of paper. But that is not what a customer wants and what our job is.”

Rather, “We serve the product and the brand, and that has a certain potential and a certain form language. My job is to analyze the potential and the uniqueness that makes this brand and this product. It is not my job to create the Hildebrand or the MINI design that’s my personal twist. My job is not to make my own monument.”

Yes, there is a case to be made for change, Hildebrand admits: when there are changes in technology (new materials, electronics, etc.) or in regulations (e.g., the new MINI was lengthened, in part, to accommodate pedestrian safety regulations). “Then it makes sense to change something. But not styling for no other reason than to change.” 

Hand holding a crystal ball

We’d rather send you $15 than rely on our crystal ball…

It’s Capital Spending Survey season and the manufacturing industry is counting on you to participate! Odds are that you received our 5-minute Metalworking survey from Automotive Design and Production in your mail or email. Fill it out and we’ll email you $15 to exchange for your choice of gift card or charitable donation. Are you in the U.S. and not sure you received the survey? Contact us to access it.

Help us inform the industry and everybody benefits.

RELATED CONTENT

  • 2015 Jeep Wrangler Willys Wheeler

    The thing about the Wrangler Willys Wheeler: It is a toy for a grown-up boy.

  • Ford: Putting on the Top Hat

    Now automakers can reuse the basic architecture and structure of a vehicle but then put with vastly different body styles, or top hats, over them. Ford is the latest automaker to join the top hat revolution and it is moving aggressively forward with plans to use fewer global architectures over multiple vehicle segments to improve profitability and operational efficiency.

  • Chip Foose: Humble Genius

    Scene 1After speaking at Detroit's Cobo Hall during the North American International Auto Show, Chip Foose seems genuinely taken with the evident adulation of the audience, and takes the time to answer every question and sign autographs.The second oldest child and only male in a family with four kids, Chip Foose was born in Santa Barbara, California, on October 6, 1963.